How to Overcome Cat and Investment Losses - Good Underwriting

Posted at Aug 10, 2016 7:00:00 AM by Ivan P. Maddox


Insurers are posting results for the second quarter now, and cat losses are making headlines. There were certainly a lot of claims, with Q2 driving the highest cat losses seen since Sandy in 2012. The One Brief (from Aon) published an excellent synopsis of the losses here and it makes bleak reading.

On the same day as the Aon article, Travelers published their results. Sure enough, they shared some discouraging news:

  • Catastrophe losses of $333 million, up from $221 million for the same period last year, driven by wildfires at Fort McMurray in Canada and hail storms in Texas.
  • Net and operating income of $664 million and $649 million, respectively, declined from the prior year quarter, primarily due to the higher catastrophe losses, higher non-catastrophe weather-related losses and lower net investment income.
  • It was the smallest quarterly profit since 2012 after superstorm Sandy.

Doom and gloom…but wait.

Their underwriting performance actually improved. Their underwriting efficiency improved (a very respectable 93.1 combined ratio), and they expanded their net written premium by 3% to a record $6.345 billion.

The benefits of sound underwriting were also displayed by CNA – higher cat losses and losses due to investment returns offset by an improved combined ratio (97.4, down from 98.4) and higher written premium.

This is exciting because it shows how insurers are finding opportunity in the protection gap AND improving their underwriting profitability. These results illustrate beautifully the value of sound underwriting, which depend upon modern underwriting systems.

Topics: Insurance Protection Gap, Effective Underwriting, Insurance Underwriting, Natural Catastrophe

Comment Form