---
title: How vulnerable is your building to earthquake risk?
description: There are two key metrics used to understand the vulnerability of a building, which is key for modeling earthquake risk.
image: https://www.goinsitepro.com/hubfs/Blog%20Images/news_banner.png
---

[![InsitePro Logo](https://www.goinsitepro.com/hs-fs/hubfs/InsiteProGlobe-with-text-web-2.png?width=500&name=InsiteProGlobe-with-text-web-2.png "InsitePro Logo")](https://www.goinsitepro.com/)

[![InsitePro Logo](https://www.goinsitepro.com/hs-fs/hubfs/insitepro_2018/images/InsitePro4%20(1).png?width=500&name=InsitePro4%20(1).png "InsitePro Logo")](https://www.goinsitepro.com/)

[Contact Us](http://www-goinsitepro-com.sandbox.hs-sites.com/contact-us) | [+1 877-837-7246](tel:+1%20877-837-7246)

- [Why InsitePro](https://www.goinsitepro.com/why-insitepro)
- [Flood](https://www.goinsitepro.com/flood-insurance)
- [Wildfire](https://www.goinsitepro.com/wildfire-insurance)
- [Retail Agents](https://www.goinsitepro.com/retail-agents)
- [About](https://www.goinsitepro.com/about-intermap)
- [Blog](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog)

## How vulnerable is your building to earthquake risk?

Posted at May 27, 2015 10:00:00 AM by [Ivan P. Maddox](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/author/ivan-p-maddox)

- [Tweet](https://twitter.com/share)

![news_banner](https://www.goinsitepro.com/hubfs/Blog%20Images/news_banner.png)

[In my previous post](http://www.intermap.com/risks-of-hazard-blog/2015/05/2-metrics-that-try-to-predict-an-earthquake), I explored the two earthquake metrics that help insurers understand the likelihood of an earthquake affecting a specific location. This post is about the two metrics that express the severity of property damage in the event an earthquake does occur.

![iStock_000012162829_Small](https://www.goinsitepro.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Risks%20of%20Hazard%20Blog%20Posts/iStock_000012162829_Small.jpg?width=399&name=iStock_000012162829_Small.jpg)Unlike the science behind earthquake forecasting, which has limited capabilities, the science behind the civil engineering that enables buildings and structures to withstand earthquakes is well developed. Insurance analytics and earthquake models leverage this engineering know-how to estimate potential damage (or *vulnerability*, to use the modeling term) for a given building. 

Since the vulnerability is better understood than the likelihood, almost all insurance analytics include vulnerability. Some insurers and brokers evaluate earthquake risk entirely on vulnerability. Jumping straight to vulnerability means the risk assessment of a building is actually a rating or pricing analysis — unlike flood modeling, where many available risk analytics present a lot of information before pricing and rating takes place.

**There are two key metrics used to understand the vulnerability of a building: soil type and peak ground acceleration.**

**Soil type** is a critical factor, because the density of the ground has a direct effect on the amount of motion the ground will experience during a quake. Hard ground propels the energy quickly with a small amplitude, while soft ground slows the energy down and increases the amplitude of the motion. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has a standard scale describing soil types, with Type A being susceptible to the smaller damaging motion, and Type F residing at the other end of the spectrum.

- **Type A:** Hard rock (igneous rock)
- **Type B:** Rock (volcanic rock)
- **Type C: **Very dense soil and soft rock (sandstone)
- **Type D:** Stiff soil (mud)
- **Type E:** Soft soil (artificial fill)
- **Type F:** Soils requiring site-specific evaluation

Another important aspect of soil type is the possibility of liquefaction, which is when the moisture content of the ground, when agitated, disturbs the support structure of the dirt and turns it into a liquid mess. The transformation of solid ground to mud beneath a building has obvious consequences. Types D, E, and F are subject to liquefaction, and thus higher vulnerability for structures built on it.

**Peak ground acceleration** (pga) is the second metric describing vulnerability. This measurement is taken directly from the engineering used to build earthquake-resilient structures, which is a useful correlation between building types (or even better, building codes) and potential damage. Unlike all the other earthquake metrics discussed, this one is measured with instruments deployed around the world to record the movement of the Earth, meaning the sensitivity and understanding of the metric is well refined. The pga is expressed as a decimal of g, or the gravitational acceleration at sea level. It is interesting to compare non-intuitive pga values with observed earthquake intensity:

- 0.001 g – perceptible by people
- 0.02 g – people lose their balance
- 0.50 g – very high; well-designed buildings can survive if the duration is short

It’s also neat to compare pga values on a more granular level to experienced sensation and vulnerability:

| **Acceleration** | **Perceived Shaking** | **Potential Damage** |
| --- | --- | --- |
| < 0.0017 | Not felt | None |
| 0.0017 – 0.014 | Weak | None |
| 0.014 – 0.039 | Light | None |
| 0.039 – 0.092 | Moderate | Very light |
| 0.092 – 0.18 | Strong | Light |
| 0.18 – 0.34 | Very Strong | Moderate |
| 0.34 – 0.65 | Severe | Moderate to heavy |
| 0.65 – 1.24 | Violent | Heavy |
| > 1.24 | Extreme | Very heavy |

However, these metrics don’t always track accurately with the damage caused by an earthquake, because there is another aspect to them that can’t be modeled or predicted: duration of the quake. The [Great Alaskan Earthquake](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1964_Alaska_earthquake) of 1964 had a relatively low pga of 0.18 (i.e., moderate damage potential, as per the chart above), but it basically destroyed large parts of Anchorage and other towns because it lasted for *over four and a half minutes!*

Even though earthquake models have a [long historical record](http://www.intermap.com/risks-of-hazard-blog/2015/05/brief-history-of-assessing-earthquake-risk) and rich datasets to leverage, they can only aspire to be useful estimations of when and how bad an earthquake might happen. For insurers, earthquake models and analytics are indispensible, even though they are flawed. Unlike with flood, reducing the [underwriting leakage](http://www.intermap.com/risks-of-hazard-blog/2015/01/reduce-underwriting-leakage-with-better-data) on earthquake is very difficult because the inherent uncertainty is unavoidable.

Competition around earthquake insurance depends less on analytics than on the appetite, capacity, and experience of a carrier. Broking earthquake coverage is focused on sharing the best possible information with property owners and carriers to simply get the best possible coverage and price combination. When the next big urban earthquake strikes, it will catch everyone by surprise, but nobody will be surprised.

 

 Topics: [Natural Hazard Risk](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/topic/natural-hazard-risk), [Risk Models](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/topic/risk-models), [Earthquake](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/topic/earthquake)

### Comment Form

![sidebar-bg](https://www.goinsitepro.com/hs-fs/hubfs/sidebar-bg.jpg?width=280&name=sidebar-bg.jpg "sidebar-bg")

# The Risks of Hazard Blog

Welcome to The Risks of Hazard, brought to you by Intermap Technology. From the latest industry news and trends, to insight from thought leaders around the globe, stay tuned for a variety of content aimed at helping you better understand the role of location-based intelligence in the world of insurance underwriting and risk assessment.

![sidebar-bg](https://www.goinsitepro.com/hs-fs/hubfs/sidebar-bg.jpg?width=280&name=sidebar-bg.jpg "sidebar-bg")

### Subscribe to the Risks of Hazard blog!

![sidebar-bg](https://www.goinsitepro.com/hs-fs/hubfs/sidebar-bg.jpg?t=1539078502257&width=280&name=sidebar-bg.jpg "sidebar-bg")

### Posts by Tag

- [Flood Insurance (60)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/flood-insurance)
- [Insurance Underwriting (60)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/insurance-underwriting)
- [Risk Management (41)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/risk-management)
- [Flood Risk (39)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/flood-risk)
- [Insurance Protection Gap (29)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/insurance-protection-gap)
- [Flood Modeling (27)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/flood-modeling)
- [Property Insurance (26)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/property-insurance)
- [Natural Catastrophe (25)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/natural-catastrophe)
- [Natural Hazard Risk (25)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/natural-hazard-risk)
- [Private Flood (25)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/private-flood)
- [InsitePro (21)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/insitepro)
- [Floods (19)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/floods)
- [Insurance Technology (17)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/insurance-technology)
- [Wildfire (17)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/wildfire)
- [Insurance Software (16)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/insurance-software)
- [Risk Scoring (14)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/risk-scoring)
- [Effective Underwriting (13)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/effective-underwriting)
- [Earthquake (12)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/earthquake)
- [Other Risk Models (11)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/other-risk-models)
- [NFIP (10)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/nfip)
- [Risk Models (8)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/risk-models)
- [Hurricane (7)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/hurricane)
- [Houston (6)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/houston)
- [Big Data (5)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/big-data)
- [Flood News (5)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/flood-news)
- [Innovation in Insurance (5)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/innovation-in-insurance)
- [Insurance News (5)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/insurance-news)
- [Cloud Computing (4)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/cloud-computing)
- [Hail (4)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/hail)
- [Underwriting Profit (4)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/underwriting-profit)
- [FEMA (3)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/fema)
- [Insurance Disruption (3)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/insurance-disruption)
- [Location-Based Intelligence (3)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/location-based-intelligence)
- [Terrain Data (3)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/terrain-data)
- [Analytics (2)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/analytics)
- [Blogs (2)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/blogs)
- [California (2)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/california)
- [Fire Insurance (2)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/fire-insurance)
- [Geocoding (2)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/geocoding)
- [Agreement (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/agreement)
- [Canada Flood Risk (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/canada-flood-risk)
- [Conference (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/conference)
- [Coverholders (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/coverholders)
- [Data Management (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/data-management)
- [Data and Models (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/data-and-models)
- [GAO (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/gao)
- [Global Flood Map (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/global-flood-map)
- [Government (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/government)
- [Inside Intermap (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/inside-intermap)
- [Pipeline Operations (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/pipeline-operations)
- [Survey (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/survey)
- [Technologies (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/technologies)
- [Top Ten (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/top-ten)
- [Top Three (1)](https://www.goinsitepro.com/blog/tag/top-three)

see all

[![InsiteProGlobe-with-text-web-1](https://www.goinsitepro.com/hs-fs/hubfs/InsiteProGlobe-with-text-web-1.png?width=1062&name=InsiteProGlobe-with-text-web-1.png "InsiteProGlobe-with-text-web-1")](https://www.goinsitepro.com/)

©2026 Intermap Technologies®. All rights reserved.

- [Legal](https://www.goinsitepro.com/intermap-legal-information)
- [Disclaimer](https://www.goinsitepro.com/disclaimer)
- [Terms of Use](https://www.goinsitepro.com/intermap.com-terms-of-use)